A blue book is a blueprint that shows how to build anything, but its creators aren’t too happy with the term.
The book is designed to be used by engineers and architects, but critics are questioning whether it’s good enough for the real world.
“I would think it would be better if it were made for architects, not engineers,” one of the authors, Peter Schleifer, told News24.
“It is a good tool to help architects create designs and to guide them to use their abilities in their own business.”
But it is not a blueprint for building.
“The architects should be using the blue book to guide the design of their projects and to use the blue books to guide their work in the real life, as opposed to the blue-book.”
If the blue is the blueprint, then the architects are the ones who have to build it and if they don’t, the architects will not build it.
“The blue book was created to guide architects in the building of buildings, but the architects and designers have taken the blue to its own extreme.”
We want the architects to do their own work,” said Schlefer.”
This is a great tool to assist the architects, who are often asked to design a building.
“The architects will use the tool to build their own buildings and use the blueprint to guide those efforts.”
“There is a lot of tension in the architecture community between architects and architects.
It’s like this is a clash between the two worlds.”
In an interview with The Daily Telegraph, Schleefer said: “Architects can do a lot more with the bluebook, but they have to follow a very strict and strict set of rules, rules that are very specific.”
That’s why architects tend to be very sceptical of the bluebooks, as it is too complex, it’s too complicated and too hard to use.
“They want to be able to use it for design work, and it’s also very challenging to use them for construction work.”
Architectures are very much looking for the best, and the blue has been a great way of doing that.
“Mr Schleefeld said he was not surprised by the criticism.”
What is happening in the architectural community is a bit of a shock to me,” he said.”
Some people feel that the blue was a good idea, and I don’t think that’s necessarily the case, but that’s why I’m doing this.
“There are some architects who really like the blue and others who don’t.”
But he said the blue wasn’t designed to guide anyone.
“People like to build things and I’m not sure if it’s a good or bad thing, but I think that it’s important for the architects that the blueprint is used,” he explained.
“For example, if they have a lot to do with their own designs and are doing things in their business and not necessarily with the blueprint that’s created, they will not have the same freedom in designing as architects do.”
Ultimately, we need architects to be designing our projects and not just using the blueprint.””
Archives should have a role in building,” he added.